Legal Opinion

State v. William Roseman and Lori Lewin (073674)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 2015No. A-105-13 A-106-13PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solomon

We are called upon to determine whether denial of defendants’ applications to Pretrial Intervention (PTI) by the prosecutor was a patent and gross abuse of discretion. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division and reinstate the trial court’s order compelling defendants’ admission into the Bergen County Pretrial Intervention Program over the objection of the prosecutor.

I

The record of the trial court proceedings reveals the following. Defendants William Roseman and Lori Lewin were married from 1992 until 2000, during which time Roseman was elected the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. State v. BenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. State v. NwobuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. Davon M. Johnson (080394) (Essex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. State of New Jersey v. Steven RizzitelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  3. State of New Jersey v. Alfred W. Coursey, IIINew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  4. State of New Jersey v. James DenmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  5. ALISA FORMAN VS. MARK FORMAN (FM-13-0785-11, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API