Legal Opinion

R & S INVESTMENTS v. Auto Auctions, Ltd.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2006No. A-04-1098PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

R&S Investments (R&S) holds an easement on the property of Auto Auctions, Ltd., for the use of two sanitary sewer lagoons and all necessary piping and connections to the lagoons. After acquiring the property on which R&S’ easement lies, Auto Auctions relocated the easement by filling one of the original lagoons with dirt, constructing a new lagoon for use by both property owners, and providing R&S with the necessary connections to the new lagoon. R&S filed suit against Auto Auctions and Phil B. Durst, the president of Auto Auctions, in the district court for Lancaster…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Rauscher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Smith v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lambert v. HolmbergNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Lincoln v. Realty Trust Group, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. McGoey v. BraceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. HOMESTEAD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wilkison v. City of ArapahoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. 3'S LOUNGE INC. v. TierneyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API