Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Spaulding

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1997No. C016864PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

This appeal poses the question whether a party who intends to call a treating physician to testify at trial not only as to the physician’s treatment of a patient, but also to give an expert opinion on the standard of care that another physician should have employed when treating the patient, must provide an expert witness declaration during discovery. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2034, subds. (a)(2) & (f)(2); further section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.)

Donna M. Plunkett (plaintiff) designated two of her treating physicians as persons…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Schreiber v. Estate of KiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Britts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation v. Edmund A. Gray Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Miller v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API