Legal Opinion
State v. Riggs
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 21, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 94-0970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
Donald Martin Riggs (defendant) appeals his convictions and sentences for six counts of forgery, claiming that business records and expert testimony were improperly admitted into evidence and that his right to confrontation was violated when he was not permitted to examine victim, Timothy Enos, about Enos’s refusal to allow a pre-trial interview. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant and Enos started a business, Personal Gay Matching Service (PGMS), in June 1993. PGMS had a business checking account with Chase Bank of Arizona and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Michigan v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. PeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Kenneth W. Wood v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- State v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996