Legal Opinion

State v. Taggart

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 21, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 94-0926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

Darren Taggart appeals from his conviction on two counts of aggravated assault. He claims that he should have been allowed to cross-examine the victims about their refusal to be interviewed by his attorney before trial. We find that although the restriction on cross-examination violated the Defendant’s right to confrontation, the error, under the particular facts of this case, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Late on a night in March of 1994, the victims, R and P, were riding home on their bicycles from their jobs as restaurant workers when the Defendant rode up to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API