Legal Opinion
Mikula v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 7, 2000No. AC 19640PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*593 Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
Two of the defendants in this appeal,1 Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. (Shaw’s), and Sedgwick James of Connecticut, the administrator of Shaw’s self-insurance plan, appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming a finding by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) that the plaintiff, Robert Mikula, sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Shaw’s in 1997 and is entitled to compensation for partial disability under General Statutes § 31-308 (a).2 The defendants claim that the board improperly *594affi…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Tovish v. Gerber ElectronicsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Tovish v. Gerber ElectronicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Dinck v. Gellatly Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sellers v. Sellers Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001