Legal Opinion

Dinck v. Gellatly Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 3, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The commissioner found that the plaintiff suffered an accidental injury arising out of and during his employment, and awarded compensation. The defendant appealed to the Superior Court and thereafter filed a motion to have the finding corrected as to certain subordinate facts and a contrary conclusion reached. In support thereof it submitted excerpts from the transcript of the testimony produced before the commissioner, who had died prior .to the filing of the motion. The parties stipulated that the entire record should be used by the successor commissioner. He denied the motion and certified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Cormican v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Howe v. Watkins BrothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. France v. MunsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Garofola v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mikula v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Steedley v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API