Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Laudeau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 1938No. Nos. 34872-34877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

In each of the above cases, counsel for the appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction ratione materiae.

Plaintiffs are landowners, each owning separate tracts in the same section of the Parish of Evangeline. In 1931 they executed separate mineral leases in favor of Emile Ludeau, each lease containing the usual one-eighth royalty clause. In the year 1934 each of the plaintiffs entered into a contract reciting that the grantor “does by these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey and deliver” unto Emile Ludeau, Lawrence Ludeau…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Holmes v. WiltzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  2. Garrett v. SprattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Bensel v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. French v. Trout Creek Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. Murff v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eagle Lake Improvement Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. New Orleans Northeastern R. Co. v. RedmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Duplantis v. LocascioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Frierson v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API