Legal Opinion

Bensel v. Kuhlman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 11, 1923No. 23701PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rejecting their demand for $3,500 damages for trespass alleged to have been committed by defendants on plaintiffs’ property.

The facts alleged in the petition show that plaintiffs have exaggerated the amount of the injury, if they suffered any. The damage alleged could not possibly be $2,000, or near that sum. This court has jurisdiction in *152cases like this when the amount in dispute exceeds $2,000. Const, art. 7, § 10. The allegation that the amount of damages suffered in this case exceeds $2,000 is contradicted by the facts alleged.

It is ordered that…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Breaux v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Nash v. CuretteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Jackson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Young v. EddyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Fontenot v. LaudeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API