Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. State Compensation Insurance Authority

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 9, 1990No. 88SC576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

We granted certiorari to review the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Subsequent Injury Fund v. State Compensation Insurance Authority, 768 P.2d 751 (Colo.App.1988). The issue is whether the obligation to pay permanent disability benefits to which an employee is entitled under the workers’ compensation laws shall fall upon the employer and its insurer or upon the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF). The court of appeals held that the SIF was liable for all permanent total disability benefits exceeding ten thousand dollars owed to an employee rendered permanently and totally disabled by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Denver v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. IML Freight, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Hall v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Pena v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Subsequent Injury Fund v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API