Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Bunker Hill Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1974No. 11616 and 11617PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

These two appeals were taken from two workmen’s compensation awards entered by default against defendant-appellant Bunker Hill Company by the Idaho Industrial Commission. On motion, they were consolidated for the purposes of this appeal.

In no. 11617, claimant-respondent Eddie A. Bailey filed an application for a hearing with the Industrial Commission. In this application, Bailey alleged that he had injured his back in an accident in the course of his employment at the appellant-employer’s plant. The appellant was served with a copy of Bailey’s application for hearing; the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dean v. Dravo CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Swanson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Johnson v. NolandIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Thomas v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bunn v. BunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shelton v. Diamond International Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Pioneer Title Co. of Ada CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API