Legal Opinion

Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 22, 1984No. 568, Docket 83-7792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Weinfeld, J., Swaida v. IBM Retirement Plan, 570 F.Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y.1983), granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The district court held that the elapsed time regulations promulgated by the Department of the Treasury were within its competence and in the exercise of delegated authority and that IBM, having structured its pension plan in conformity therewith, acted justifiably when it denied plaintiff’s claim to a vested pension.

We affirm the judgment of the district court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swaida v. IBM Retirement PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clifford C. Coleman v. Interco Incorporated Divisions' PlansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Apitz v. Teledyne Monarch Rubber Hourly Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. Swaida v. Ibm Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API