Legal Opinion

Burns v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 28, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs sue for rent alleged to be due them for the period from May 1, 1941, to July 15, 1941, on a lease of a store in Malden. The defendant contends that the lease terminated by its own terms on April 30, 1941, and that no rent accrued thereafter.

The question can be settled by a construction of the language of the lease. The habendum clause defines the term of the lease as “from the first day of May 1938, to the last day of April, 1941,” but this must be construed in connection with a so called “postponement clause,” also included in the lease, which reads, “Whereas part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wunsch v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Bielanski v. Westfield Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. College of the Virgin Islands v. Vitex Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1966
  4. College of the Virgin Islands v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.Municipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1965
  5. Galvin v. Excel Switching Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API