Legal Opinion

State v. Rich

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1995No. CR-95-0204-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Memorandum Decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Filed March 14, 1995, VACATED IN PART

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The court of appeals upheld defendant’s conviction for possession of marijuana for sale despite the trial court’s failure to disclose to defendant or his counsel that the jury had returned an inconsistent guilty verdict on the lesser included offense of possession. We granted defendant’s petition for review and have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const., art. VI, § 5(3).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged with both possession of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MataArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KochArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Perkins v. KomarnyckyjArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. BurnettsArizona Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BassArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. McCrimmonArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. BenenatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API