State v. Ekmanis
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
While burglarizing the storage room of a patio home in central Phoenix, Ingmar Ekmanis (“Appellant”) was shot by the homeowner. The issues on appeal are whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on second degree burglary (residential structure) and whether it properly refused to instruct the jury on third degree burglary (nonresidential structure). We affirm.
Appellant’s testimony, in brief, was that he had run out of gas on his way home from the pool hall, so he gathered some items from his truck—a lock pick, a tension bar, a scratch awl, and a flashlight—and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. SheirodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Rivera-OrosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pedro Martinez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State of Arizona v. Joann BonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. BassCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.