Legal Opinion
United States v. SunGard Data Systems, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2001No. 01-02196(ESH)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, has filed suit pursuant to Section 15 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 25, to enjoin Sun-Gard Data Systems, Inc. (“SunGard”) from acquiring the disaster recovery solutions assets of Comdisco, Inc. (“Comdisco”) on the grounds that the acquisition would substantially lessen competition in the market for shared hotsite disaster recovery services for mainframe and midrange computers, in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.
Defendants have set forth a series of arguments in opposition to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. Oracle Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Federal Trade Commission v. Arch Coal, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sysco CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- King v. JCS Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.