Legal Opinion
Timex Corp. v. Stoller
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1997No. 3:95 CV 2505(GLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Timex Corporation (“Timex”) moves for summary judgment on each count of its complaint. Defendants cross move for summary judgment based on unclean hands. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion (Document #30) is GRANTED and defendants’ motion (Document #39) is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Leo Stoller is a citizen of the State of Illinois. He is the current president and chief executive officer of, and controls, two Delaware corporations — defendants Stealth Industries, Inc. (“Stealth Industries”) and S. Industries, Inc. (“S Industries”).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Manufacturers Technologies, Inc. v. Cams, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group Of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- S Industries, Inc. v. Stone Age Equipment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- S Industries, Inc. v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- New Colt Holding Corp. v. RJG Holdings of Florida, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.