Legal Opinion

Cruickshank v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 4, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00924Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 RONNIE LEE CRUICKSHANK, CASE NO. C20-0924JLR 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING 28 U.S.C. v. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE 12 JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Petitioner Ronnie Lee Cruickshank’s motion to vacate the 17 judgment in his criminal matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Mot (Dkt. # 1); see also Reply 18 (Dkt. # 6).) Mr. Cruickshank contends that the court must vacate his conviction in his 19 criminal matter in light of the Supreme Court’s decision…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API