Legal Opinion

Commercial Capital Corporation, a Corporation, G.N. Van Horn and Bert Chesnut v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 2, 1966No. 15365_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners Van Horn and Chesnut appearing pursuant to subpoena, testified in a nonpublic investigation conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to Commercial Capital Corporation and others.

Thereafter, on May 28, 1965, petitioners’ attorney requested permission, pursuant to Rule 6 of the SEC’s Rules Relating to Investigations (17 CFR § 203.6) to purchase copies of their transcripts from the official reporter.

On July 21, 1965, a letter was issued from the Securities and Exchange Commission bearing the signature of the Commission’s secretary which…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. SecCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Willard J. Lamorte v. Hon. Walter R. Mansfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API