Legal Opinion

Cline v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1998No. 36, 1998PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal we reverse the trial court’s denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. During its case in chief, the State presented evidence only of the amount and packaging of the drugs the defendant possessed as well as defendant’s flight from apprehension. We are asked to consider whether this constitutes sufficient evidence of intent to deliver to survive a motion for judgment of acquittal. We decide that it does not.

Background

On August 23, 1997, Corporal Ralph S. Hale of the Wilmington Police Department…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Hoey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Poon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API