Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Arkus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1982No. 81-1191PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Arkus was convicted on eight counts of mail fraud, and contends that dismissal of his indictment is required by the government’s failure to bring him to trial within the 70-day time limit imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, (Act) 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. (1976 and Supp. Ill 1979), and because his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. We affirm his conviction.
FACTS
On July 31, 1980, Arkus and three business associates were indicted and arraigned on numerous counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Trial was set for October 7, 1980. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Carl FieldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. SebastianDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Rojas-ContrerasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Eddie Ray RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.