Legal Opinion

Witt v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1994No. SC S40905Published

1Opinion of the Court

872 P.2d 14 (1994)

319 Or. 7

Terry L. WITT and J. Edward Schroeder, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S40905.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 25, 1994.

Reassigned, February 15, 1994.

Decided May 3, 1994.

John DiLorenzo, Jr. of Hagen, Dye, Hirschy & DiLorenzo, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Witt v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kenagy v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API