Legal Opinion

Pankajkumar S. Patel v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 6, 2019No. 17-10636PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

*1322This case presents interesting, and rather complicated, questions of statutory interpretation.

Pankajkumar Patel, an immigrant facing removal, asks us to review a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Board held that Patel is inadmissible, and thus cannot get relief from removal, because he falsely represented himself as a citizen when applying for a Georgia driver's license. The relevant statute provides that an alien is inadmissible if he falsely represents himself as a U.S. citizen "for any purpose or benefit" under the law. 8 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Highpoint Tower Technology Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. ZHANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Elvis George, Mark Lonski, and Property Kings, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API