Legal Opinion

Skiff v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 20, 1932No. Division APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the statutory offense denounced by section 5409 R. G. S., 7552 C. G. L.

The previous chaste character of the alleged victim is a material fact to be proved. The evidence in the instant ease of the previous chastity of the alleged victim is far from convincing. In fact, the record discloses much convincing evidence of her previous unchaste character and in the motion for new trial, one ground of which was the existence of newly discovered evidence, the defendant in the court below presented the affidavits of three persons in which further proof of her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Nims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Platt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Sosa v. MaxwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. State v. TibbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API