Fuller v. State

Plaintiff in Error, hereinafter called, the defendant, was convicted of murder in the second degree. On writ of error, the principal contention is the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the homicide.

The evidence in this case is lengthy and in many essentials unique. The possibility of the occurrence of another case on substantially the same facts as are here involved is too remote to justify a review of the evidence.’

In considering this case, we are mindful of the oft repeated rule that in a criminal prosecution, a verdict of guilty…