Hardman v. Feinstein
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
This appeal follows the trial court's order sustaining a demurrer to appellants’ first amended complaint (complaint) without leave to amend on the ground that appellants do not have standing to bring the action. We affirm. A resident and taxpayer of a city who has no special interest in a charitable trust does not have standing to bring an action seeking to enjoin mismanagement of the trust, even though the trust is administered pursuant to a city charter and the trustees are city officials.
I
Procedural Background
The complaint alleges the following. Appellants, Paul D. Hardman,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & SurgeonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- L.B. Research & Education Foundation v. UCLA FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Patton v. SherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Palm Springs v. Living Desert ReserveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Autonomous Region of Narcotics Anon v. Narcotics Anon World SvcsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.