Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Phosphate Corp. v. Phosphate Recovery Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 1939No. 6498Published

1DissentBiggs, Circuit Judge

The patent sub judice deals with a method of recovering phosphates. As has been stated, phosphates form deposits in certain areas of Florida where they lie buried beneath a few feet of sandy soil. The covering of earth is removed, the phosphate-bearing deposits are broken down by streams of water and the phosphates themselves with the soil are piped to washing plants where some of the phosphate particles are removed from the waste materials by screening. Only about 50 per cent, of the phosphate material that is so -mined is recoverable. The smaller particles of phosphate material pass through…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. Pantex Pressing MacH., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  5. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Calehuff Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API