Legal Opinion

In re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 16, 1981No. MDL No. 448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HUNGATE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a joint motion by all defendants to compel discovery. For the reasons stated below defendants’ joint motion will be denied.

Defendants move the Court to compel production of the following documents from plaintiffs in all cases consolidated in this multidistrict securities litigation:

1. Plaintiffs’ 1980 income tax returns; and

2. All documents relating to plaintiffs’ fee arrangements with their attorneys.

In support of their motion, defendants claim that these requests are relevant to the issue of certification for a class…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pedro Gonzales v. Clifton W. Cassidy, Jr., John Richard Hayes, Iii, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. James W. Sanderson v. The Honorable Fred M. Winner, United States District Judge for the District OfcoloradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Ralston v. Volkswagenwerk, A. G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  5. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. KruegerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jansen v. Greyhound Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1986
  3. In re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Roseman v. Sports & RecreationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
  5. Van-S-Aviation v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API