Portillo v. Aiassa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Respondent Anthony Portillo was attacked and seriously injured by a dog. He brought an action against the dog’s owner, John Kim, 1 and the owner’s landlord, appellant Henry Aiassa. After the jury rendered a verdict in favor of respondent, appellant filed the instant appeal. He contends the trial court erred in its jury instructions on a landlord’s duty of care. We hold that a landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care in the inspection of his commercial property and to remove a dangerous condition, which includes a dog, from the premises, if he knew, or in the exercise…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shields v. WagmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Chee v. Amanda Goldt Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Donchin v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Martinez v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.