Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Benson County Water Resource District

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2000No. 990368-990373, 990378-990380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Rail Railway Company (“BN”); Ronald Hausmann and Lila Hausmann (“Haus-manns”); Donald Haugen; and Charles Studness appealed a district court order of October 6, 1999, and judgment of October 14, 1999, affirming revised findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order issued by the Benson County Water Resource District (“District”) on May 4, 1999, requiring the installation of culverts through a township road and a railroad. We conclude the District exceeded its authority, and we reverse.

I

[¶ 2] A recent wet cycle has resulted in high water…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Jones v. Boeing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kadlec v. Greendale Township Board of Township SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Anderson v. Richland County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Buchholz v. Barnes County Water BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ramsey County Farm Bureau v. Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API