Meyer v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Petitioners appeal an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirming the City of Portland’s (city) approval of a planned unit development (PUD) preliminary plan and approval of tentative subdivision plats which constitute the first of several development phases. Petitioners challenge LUBA’s approval of the city’s action for a number of reasons, most of which flow from the city’s alleged failure to make the findings of fact required by the Portland City Code (Code). We affirm.
The city approved the application for a conditional use permit to develop the PUD on approximately 600 acres…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- West v. City of AstoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Commonwealth Properties, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Golf Holding Co. v. McEachronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Greenfield v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.