Legal Opinion

Scheibner v. Cohnen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Carpenter, J. Bill by Ferdinand Scheibner against Frank Cohnen and wife to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

We agree with the court below that this case does not fall within the principle of Gibbs v. Hanchette, 90 Mich. 657. That case was distinguished in Lamont v. Le Fevre, 96 Mich. 175. In speaking of the Gibbs Case, it was there said:

“The case of Gibbs v. Hanchette carefully distinguishes between such cases and those where, through an honest mistake, too much has been claimed in the statement of lien, or, by reason of a failure of proof, the claimant was denied the entire amount claimed.”

It is evident to us, from the claimant’s testimony, that, in stating the amount of his claim, he was honestly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. HanchetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lamont v. LeFevreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. GibbonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hallmark, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ypsilanti Lumber & Coal Co. v. LeslieMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Halpin v. GarmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Griff v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API