Legal Opinion

Valido-Shade v. Wyeth LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 2014No. MDL Docket No. 1203; Civil Action No. 12-20003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SEPARATE PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 9368

BARTLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Liza Valido-Shade and her husband Tim Shade have sued defendant Wyeth for damages they have allegedly sustained as a result of her ingestion of Wyeth’s diet drugs known as Pondimin® and Redux (“Fen-Phen”). The action was originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and timely removed to this court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. According to plaintiffs, Valido-Shade took the drugs for a number of months in 1996 and 1997 and was diagnosed in 2010 with pulmonary arterial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HOEFLING v. ALTRIA GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. RIAD v. PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API