Legal Opinion
AQUAPAW BRANDS LLC v. FLO PET
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00988Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AQUAPAW BRANDS LLC, 2:21-cv-00988-CCW Plaintiff, v. FLOPET, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Plaintiff Aquapaw Brand LLC’s (“Aquapaw”) Motion for Default Judgment. ECF No. 49. For the reasons that follow, Aquapaw’s Motion will be GRANTED. I. Procedural History Aquapaw filed its Complaint on July 27, 2021. ECF No. 2. The Complaint alleges that Defendants offered for sale, sold, and distributed “knock-off versions” of Aquapaw’s “Pet Bathing Tool” product. Id. at 2–3. According to Aquapaw, such…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.