Legal Opinion
Lenroot v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 28, 1944No. 1467PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
The only question for decision in this case is whether a permanent injunction should be granted against the defendant to prevent violations of the federal Child Labor Law.
*235The action was instituted under the provisions of Sections 203, 211, 212 and 217, 29 U.S.C.A., relating to the general subject of Labor and particularly to Fair Labor Standards and the employment of children in manufactories. The claimed violations relate to the employment of minors in the production of goods in interstate commerce in violation of the “oppressive child labor” provision of said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Truly v. WanzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Solis v. Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Lenroot v. Interstate Bakeries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1944
- Volunteer Child Services, Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General1978