Legal Opinion
Walling v. Associated Truck Lines, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 8, 1944No. Civil Action No. 280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
The findings of fact and conclusions of law filed herewith obviate necessity for extended opinion. The case is presented upon stipulated facts. The dispute concerns inferences logically deducible therefrom.
The primary issue is whether or not plaintiff has sustained the burden of proof to establish such lack of good faith as to justify issuance of the writ of injunction against violation of section 15(a) (2) and (5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 215(a) (2, 5), as prayed in the complaint.
Paragraph 5 of Section V of the stipulation of facts reads:
“Defendan…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Truly v. WanzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Walling v. Shenandoah-Dives Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Walling v. T. Buettner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hodges Contracting Company and Kenneth B. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Walling v. Clinchfield Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Wirtz v. Edisto Farms DairyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
- United States v. B.C. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Thomas v. Orangeburg Theaters, Inc.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.