Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Security Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 14, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Submission óf a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

February 19, 1900, the defendant issued a policy of insurance for the sum of $1,000 on the life of plaintiff’s husband, payable at his death to the plaintiff if living, in consideration of the annual premium of $24.70 payable in advance on or before the nineteenth day of -February in every year. In his application for the insurance the insured stated his age to be twenty-nine years on his nearest birthday which was the preceding December 7, 1899.

February 19,1903, the insured gave to the defendant his note for the annual premium then due payable ninety days after date with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conway v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Taylor v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Banholzer v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific States Life Ins. Co. v. BryceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Jeske, Admx. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. O'Brien v. . Union Central Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Afro-American Life Insurance v. LaBerthSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Bumpus v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API