Legal Opinion

Hayse v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1995No. 49S10-9503-TA-333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is one of seven cases we consider today involving the constitutionality of the Controlled Substance Excise Tax (CSET). After petitioner Charles L. Hayse's arrest for growing marijuana, the Indiana Department of State Revenue assessed the Controlled Substance Excise Tax (CSET) against him. He claims this CSET assessment should be set aside because it is a second jeopardy for the same offense and thus violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. We disagree.

I. History of the Case

Police found marijuana in Hayse's home in September 1992. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Peterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Ford v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2002
  4. Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API