Peterson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Judge.
Martin Peterson appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, by which he sought reversal of his conviction of delivery of cocaine, a Class B felony. The conviction was entered upon Peterson’s plea of guilty. Peterson presents the following issues for review, which we restate as:
1. Does the holding in Bryant v. State that double jeopardy principles bar criminal prosecution for a particular drug offense following an Indiana Controlled Substance Excise Tax (CSET) assessment for the same offense apply retroactively to eases on collateral review?;
2. Did the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burkett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- James E. Dunn v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998