Legal Opinion
Hayse v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1995No. 49S10-9503-TA-333Published
1Opinion of the Court
660 N.E.2d 325 (1995)
Charles L. HAYSE, Petitioner,
v.
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE and Kenneth L. Miller, Commissioner, Respondents.
No. 49S10-9503-TA-333.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
December 27, 1995.
Andrew C. Maternowski, Indianapolis, for petitioner.
Pamela Carter, Attorney General, David A. Arthur, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for respondents.
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is one of seven cases we consider today involving the constitutionality of the Controlled Substance Excise Tax (CSET). After petitioner Charles L. Hayse's arrest for growing marijuana, the Indiana Department of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
- Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995