Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1926No. 6988PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
This is. a suit for specific performance of a contract of indemnity insurance, brought by William H. Meyers (hereinafter called plaintiff) against Continental Casualty Company, a corporation (hereinafter called defendant).
The plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture of wooden boxes and crates in the city of St. Louis, Mo, On November 2, 1921, he purchased from the defendant the policy of insurance on which this suit is predicated. The portions of the policy material to this inquiry read as follows:
“Period of policy shall be from November 2, 1921, to November 2, 1922.
“T…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Tozer v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Fairbanks Canning Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SiwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- General Tire Co. of Minneapolis v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- State Automobile Insurance Ass'n v. KooimanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.