Legal Opinion
General Tire Co. of Minneapolis v. Standard Acc. Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1933No. 9576PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
August 10, 1930, appellant was the owner of four Ford trucks, in the city of Minneapolis, Minn., which were insured by ap-pellee against damages to persons and property. The classification made and premiums charged are thus stated in the policy:
Paragraph VIII of the policy provided that the appellee company should not be lia- Me for accidents occurring wMle sueli automobiles aré “used for any purpose other than specified.”
Truck No. 1,269,112, scheduled at the lower premium rate to be used only for commercial purposes, excluding service ear use and towing, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Knights of Pythias v. KalinskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Pacific Nat. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Chicago & Big Muddy Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ca 79-2759 City of Carter Lake, a Municipal Corporation in the State of Iowa v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Home Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Raymond Pendleton v. Pan American Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Charles C. Harbin and Patricia A. Harbin v. Assurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Burnham Shoes, Inc. v. West American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.