Legal Opinion

People v. Dias

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1985No. E000949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICKLES, J.

Defendant Johnnie James Dias has appealed from an order extending his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO) for a period of two years. The contentions he has raised on appeal are: (1) the court erred in failing to follow the procedures for a “slow plea” prescribed by Bunnell v. Superior Court (1975) 13 Cal.3d 592 [119 Cal.Rptr. 302, 531 P.2d 1086]; (2) his commitment could not be extended without a finding of amenability to treatment; and (3) the petition for extended commitment was not timely filed and therefore the order appealed from is void.

Facts

Defendan…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re MoyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re ByeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In re TrummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. PaciniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API