Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 20, 1984No. 83-5394Published
1ConcurrenceAldisert, Circuit Judge
Unlike the majority, I do not find this ease to be “a difficult and close one.” It can become such only if you attempt to engraft artificial fiber and sinew to the gossamer presentation made by the Regional Director before the district court.
Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I join without reservation only Part III A and B of its opinion, wherein it defines the concept of reasonable cause under § 10® and the standard of appellate review. I accept the majority’s discussion in Part IV with the understanding that it does not advance any novel concepts of a preliminary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- University of Pittsburgh, a Non Profit Corporation v. Champion Products Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.