Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. P & B Autobody
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-1877APublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, District Judge.
This case concerns an alleged widespread fraudulent scheme, involving five automobile body shops and two insurance claims adjusters. The purpose of the scheme was to obtain payments on fraudulent insurance claims.
Seven appellants, defendants in the trial court, challenge on numerous grounds the final judgment entered after a jury trial. The judgment was for Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (“Aetna”) against(a) Betty Arhaggelidis on the theory of civil conspiracy in the sum of $373,857.28 plus interest from October 2,1989 to the date of entry of judgment;(b) the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Humana Inc. v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- In Re Lupron® Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. Michael R. Martin and Ronald D. LowderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.