Blades v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Senior Judge:
In this appeal, appellant Jonathan Blades contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him by entirely precluding cross-examination of the government’s key witness, James Bell, for bias. We agree with the appellant. Accordingly, we reverse his convictions 1 and remand for a new trial.
I
Appellant’s conviction depended solely on the testimony of Bell, the only eyewit ness to testify. In a nutshell, Bell testified that he saw appellant stab Charles Smith on June 27, 2006, at approximately 12:45 p.m. in front of 2841…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Golden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.