Legal Opinion

Blades v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2011No. 08-CF-849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

In this appeal, appellant Jonathan Blades contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him by entirely precluding cross-examination of the government’s key witness, James Bell, for bias. We agree with the appellant. Accordingly, we reverse his convictions 1 and remand for a new trial.

I

Appellant’s conviction depended solely on the testimony of Bell, the only eyewit ness to testify. In a nutshell, Bell testified that he saw appellant stab Charles Smith on June 27, 2006, at approximately 12:45 p.m. in front of 2841…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Golden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API