Legal Opinion

Cannaday v. Cossey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 28, 1958No. 5-1541PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCeorge Bose Smith, J.

On March 1, 1956, the appellants bought an improved 100-acre tract of land from the appellees, paying $2,000 down and executing an installment note for the unpaid balance of $6,000. After occupying the property for about six months the Canna-days discovered that the dwelling house had been seriously damaged by termites. They then brought this suit for a rescission of the contract, asserting that the sellers, with knowledge of the damage to the dwelling, had falsely represented it to be “a good house.” Upon conflicting evidence the chancellor concluded that the Cosseys had not acted in bad…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Fausett & Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Wright v. BoltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Gentry v. Little Rock Road MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Pywell v. HaldaneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Epley v. John Gibson Auto SalesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API