Pywell v. Haldane
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellants purchased a house from ap-pellees which appellees’ agent represented to be in good or sound condition. Subsequently the premises were found to be damaged by termites and appellants brought this action to recover damages resulting from the allegedly fraudulent representation.
The trial court found that appellees’ attention had been drawn to the fact “that there may have been termites” in the premises a year prior to the sale and that this “suspicion or knowledge” was not communicated to the broker or to appellants. The court then concluded that (1) the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fegeas v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Milkton v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Spargnapani v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Davis v. DunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quashnock v. FrostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Haviland v. DawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Quashnock v. FrostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982