Legal Opinion

Chesterman v. Barmon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1988No. 82-0538C; CA A35388; SC S33475Published

1Opinion of the Court

753 P.2d 404 (1988)

305 Or. 439

Linda CHESTERMAN, Respondent On Review,

v.

Harry BARMON, Defendant, Construction 80, Inc., Petitioner On Review, Lexington Construction, Inc., Defendant.

82-0538C; CA A35388; SC S33475.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted April 7, 1987.

Decided April 12, 1988.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.

Lawrence Matasar, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. Also on the response to the petition for review was Hoffman, Matasar & Glaeser, Portland.

CARS…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Dickinson v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API