Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adair v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1927No. 12168Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(concurring and dissenting) : This opinion was prepared as the leading opinion in this case, but as a majority of the Court have disagreed with the conclusion of the writer upon the right of the defendant bank to set off a judgment in its favor against a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, to the exclusion of the claim of the attorneys for the plaintiff under a partial assignment of what he might recover (there being no objection to the conclusion as to the plaintiff’s right of homestead), I am filing this as a dissent to the conclusion that the right of set-off does not exist.

This is an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Upshaw v. UpshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Rookard v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Ex Parte HiersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Latimer v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. Wells v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API